Interested in photography? At matthughesphoto.com you will find all the information about U.S.V.Thirty-Seven Photographs and much more about photography.
United States v. Thirty-seven …
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Thirty-Seven_Photographs
- none
United States v. Thirty-seven Photographs | The First …
- https://mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/421/united-states-v-thirty-seven-photographs
- Thirty-seven Photographs, 401 U.S. 363 (1971), the Supreme Court said a federal law that allowed customs officials to seize and keep obscene materials failed to provide adequate procedural safeguards. This decision prevents the government from using raids and the slow inventorying of evidence as a way to censor materials.
United States v. Thirty-Seven Photographs, 402 U.S. 363 …
- https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/402/363/
- Thirty-Seven Photographs, 402 U.S. 363 (1971) United States v. Thirty-Seven (37) Photographs (Luros, Claimant) No. 133 Argued January 20, 1971 Decided May 3, 1971 402 U.S. 363 Syllabus Customs agents seized as obscene photographs possessed by claimant Luros when he returned to this country from Europe on October 24, 1969.
UNITED STATES v. THIRTY-SEVEN PHOTOGRAPHS
- https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/402/363.html
- United States Supreme Court. UNITED STATES v. THIRTY-SEVEN PHOTOGRAPHS(1971) No. 133 Argued: January 20, 1971 Decided: May 3, 1971. Customs agents seized as obscene photographs possessed by claimant Luros when he returned to this country from Europe on October 24, 1969.
United States v. Thirty-Seven Photographs - Casetext
- https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-37-photographs
- In United States v. Thirty-Seven Photographs, 402 U.S. 363, 373-4, 91 S.Ct. 1400, 1406-07, 28 L.Ed.2d 822 (1971), the Supreme Court construed 19 U.S.C. § 1305(a) "to require intervals of no more than 14 days from seizure of the goods to the institution of judicial proceedings for their forfeiture and no longer than 60 days from the filing of ...
United States v. Thirty-Seven (37) Photographs
- https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-thirty-seven-37-photographs
- The agents referred the seizure to the United States Attorney, and on November 6, 1969, the Government filed its complaint seeking judicial authority to enforce the forfeiture of the photographs. On November 14, 1969, the claimant filed an answer contending the photographs were not obscene.
UNITED STATES v. THIRTY-SEVEN (37) PHOTOGRAPHS …
- https://www.thefire.org/first-amendment-library/decision/united-states-v-thirty-seven-37-photographs-luros-claimant/
- 402 U.S. 363 (1971) UNITED STATES v. THIRTY-SEVEN (37) PHOTOGRAPHS (LUROS, CLAIMANT). No. 133. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 20, 1971 Decided May 3, 1971 APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. *364 Solicitor General Griswold argued the cause for the United States. With him …
United States v. Thirty-Seven (37) Photographs, 309 F.
- https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/309/36/2096031/
- United States v. Thirty-Seven (37) Photographs, 309 F. Supp. 36 (C.D. Cal. 1970) case opinion from the US District Court for the Central District of California
U.S. v. Thirty-Seven (37) Photographs - amazon.com
- https://www.amazon.com/Thirty-Seven-Photographs-Transcript-Supporting-Pleadings/dp/1270547070
- U.S. v. Thirty-Seven (37) Photographs ; U.S. v. Reidel (Norman) U.S. Supreme Court Transcript of Record with Supporting Pleadings [ROSENWEIN, SAM, GRISWOLD, ERWIN N ...
United States v. Thirty-Seven (37) Photographs - Case …
- https://lawaspect.com/case-united-states-v-thirty-seven-37-photographs/
- During customs inspection, the Thirty-Seven Photographs involved here were seized together with certain other items. All but the photographs have been returned and only the seizure of the photographs is involved here.
Found information about U.S.V.Thirty-Seven Photographs? We have a lot more interesting things about photography. Look at similar pages for example.